Bookstore » The Art of Thinking
Details
Note: This may not be the most up-to-date information on this book. We strongly advise you visit Amazon's listing for this book. If you wish to find more books, please visit our bookstore home page.
| Authors | Allen F. Harrison, Robert M. Bramson |
|---|---|
| Published | February 5th, 2002 |
| Manufacturer | Berkley Trade |
| Media Type | Paperback |
| List Price | $15.00 |
| Our Price | $10.20 |
| You Save | $4.8 (32%) |
| Used Price | $7.50 |
| Collectors Price | $7.65 |
| Sales Rank | 237968 |
| Availability | Usually ships in 24 hours |
| Average Rating | 5.00 |
| Record Updated | July 31st, 2005 at 5:24 pm PDT |
| Lookup ID | 042518322X-3925 |
| Buy Now & Amazon's Listing | |
Photograph
Appears in Categories
This book appears in the following categories:
Customer Reviews
Pay the pocket change and buy this book! (5 stars)
I have recently been studying a lot of academic research related to this book's central theme (i.e., that people tend use one of a handful of relatively standard ways to think, learn, process information, etc). This book is probably the easiest to understand and the most practical of all the books on the subject. Big name academics like Jerome Bruner and other people involved in educational theory back up this book's claims and provide a better academic foundation for those who want to know. In the educational world, it is commonly taught that children fall into four catagories, called "ones", "twos", "threes", and "fours". These catagries are virtually the same as this book, except that Harrison and Bramson have subdivided the "threes" categries into two categories that they call "realists" and "pragmatists". I personally believe that there is little dispute that these catagories (be they four or five or six in number) do actually exist and do actually have a profound affect on the way human beings interact. As an undergraduate business management major, with a graduate education degree, I feel that this book (and books like it) should be required reading for all teachers and people involved in any sort of organization -- particularly the managers of people.
Harrison generally skips the academic "evidence" and jumps straight into the practical stuff that they have observed in their years of business consultations. This book is a great place to start. Ignore the cover, which I find to be rediculously low brow. While reading this, remember that there are plenty of "heavier" academic books that say the exact same thing and look more believable, but are probably less accessible to most folks.
To Agree or Not to Agree (4 stars)
Generally, I agree with the high ratings that other reviewers have given to this book. After I obtained my bachelor's degree in philosophy, I took the end-of-the-book test. My thinking style at that time was primarily an idealist. But after I earned my master's degree in American Studies and took the test again, I was primarily an analyst. Both these test results made sense to me given that my two degrees were separated by six years. This is one of the "hidden" values of the book: that one's "Styles of Thinking" (the original hardcover and, in my opinion, the better title for the book) may change over a period of years.
However, I do not agree that the social scientific basis for the book and the test are well-grounded. The authors give a quite vague description for the validity of their five styles of thinking. And the only basis for the validity of the test is that they have given it to thousands of people. Purportedly, because they intended to write a follow-up book, and they wanted to keep their testing criteria secret at least until the sequel. But keeping the criteria for a test secret is simply poor social science.,
Nevertheless, I find the book subjectively useful and still refer to it from time to time. I have also given the test to college students, and most of them identify with the test results. So four stars for usefulness but not five stars because of the lack of documentation.
artful thinking (5 stars)
it's a very useful books and practical. i've started applying and feel pleasure getting to know my thinking style and others as well. you can improve the way you think. useful...